- 摘 要
-
（1 中國地震局工程力學(xué)研究所， 中國地震局地震工程與工程振動重點實驗室， 三河 065201; 2 北京羿射旭科技有限公司， 北京 100050）
［摘要］介紹剪力墻結(jié)構(gòu)中的三種典型消能減震設(shè)計方案，分別為連梁型黏滯消能器方案、黏滯阻尼墻方案和采用增幅機構(gòu)的黏滯消能器方案。對三種方案進行了多遇地震下的彈性時程分析和罕遇地震作用下的彈塑性時程分析，對比分析三種消能減震方案的減震效果。結(jié)果表明，三種方案均有較好的消能減震效果，采用增幅機構(gòu)的黏滯消能器方案減震效果較好，但成本較高；黏滯阻尼墻方案造價較高，減震效果相對較差，但其對建筑功能的影響較??；連梁型黏滯消能器方案減震效果較好，造價較低，但其布置受到連梁高度的限制。
［關(guān)鍵詞］剪力墻； 消能減震設(shè)計； 黏滯阻尼墻； 黏滯消能器
中圖分類號：TU311-41文獻標(biāo)識碼：A文章編號：1002-848X(2018)09-0019-04
Comparative analysis of three typical viscous dissipation design for shear wall structures
Zhang Yu1, Li Xin2, Zhang Licheng2
(1 Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration， Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, China Earthquake Administration, Sanhe 065201， China; 2 Beijing Yishexu Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100050， China)
Abstract:Three typical design schemes for energy dissipation in shear wall structure were introduced, including the connecting beam viscous damper scheme, the viscous damping wall scheme and the amplification mechanism viscous damper scheme. The elastic time-history analysis under the frequency earthquake and the elastic-plastic time-history analysis under the rare earthquake were done, and the damping effect of the three damping schemes was compared and analyzed. The results show that all three schemes have good energy dissipation and damping effect. The amplification mechanism viscous damper scheme shows better energy dissipation effect, while the cost is higher; the viscous damping wall scheme has a higher cost and relatively poorer damping effect, but its influence on building function is relatively smaller; the connecting beam viscous damper scheme has relatively better energy dissipation effect and lower cost, but its layout is limited by the height of the beam.
Keywords:shear wall structure; energy dissipation design; viscous damping wall; viscous damper
作者簡介：張鈺，博士研究生， Email：13811125353@126.com。
