中、美、歐、日抗震規(guī)范對(duì)比*
張桂銘1，劉文鋒1,2
- 摘 要
-
（1 青島理工大學(xué)， 青島 266033； 2 山東藍(lán)色經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)工程建設(shè)與安全協(xié)調(diào)創(chuàng)新中心， 青島 266033）［摘要］對(duì)比分析中、美、歐、日的抗震設(shè)防水準(zhǔn)、彈性反應(yīng)譜、地震作用計(jì)算方法的異同，基于算例對(duì)比各國抗震規(guī)范中不同地震烈度下的地震作用設(shè)定水平。結(jié)果表明，上述抗震規(guī)范中反應(yīng)譜、地震作用計(jì)算方法的本質(zhì)是相同的，但在反應(yīng)譜的表達(dá)形式、參數(shù)確定方法和地震作用取值上存在差異。［關(guān)鍵詞］抗震規(guī)范; 地震作用; 設(shè)防水準(zhǔn); 反應(yīng)譜; 設(shè)計(jì)基底剪力中圖分類號(hào)：TU202，TU318 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A 文章編號(hào)：1002-848X(2014)19-0061-06Comparison of Chinese, American, European and Japanese seismic codesZhang Guiming1, Liu Wenfeng1,2(1 Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao 266033, China; 2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone, Qingdao 266033, China)Abstract: Similarities and differences of seismic fortification level, elastic response spectrum, calculation methods of earthquake action among Chinese, American, European, Japanese seismic codes were compared and analyzed. Based on the case, levels of earthquake action in these codes under different seismic intensities were comparied. The results show that the essence of response spectrum and calculation methods of earthquake action of the codes is similar while expression form of response spectrum, methods of determining ground motion parameters and valuing of earthquake action is different.Keywords: seismic code; earthquake action; seismic fortification level; response spectrum; design base shear*國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(50878110)。通訊作者：劉文鋒，教授，博士，Email: lwf6688@sohu.com。參考文獻(xiàn)［1］BIOT M A. A Mechanical analyzer for predition of earthquake stress［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1941（31）: 151-171.［2］GB 50011—2010建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范［S］.北京:中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，2010.［3］ASCE/SEI 7-10 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures［S］. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010［4］EN 1998-1∶2004 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings［S］. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004.［5］日本「建築基準(zhǔn)法施行令」［S］. 東京: 日本建築センター，2002.［6］山根尚志.日本地震簡介和日建設(shè)計(jì)的抗震設(shè)計(jì)［J］.建筑鋼結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)展, 2008,10(3):56-61.［7］羅開海,王亞勇.中美歐抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范地震動(dòng)參數(shù)換算關(guān)系的研究［J］.建筑結(jié)構(gòu),2006,36(8):103-107.［8］周錫元,曾德民.估計(jì)不同服役期結(jié)構(gòu)的抗震設(shè)防水準(zhǔn)的簡單方法［J］.建筑結(jié)構(gòu),2002,32(1):37-40.［9］TJ 11—74工業(yè)與民用建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范［S］.北京:中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1974.［10］TJ 11—78工業(yè)與民用建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范［S］.北京:中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1978.［11］GBJ 11—89 建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范［S］. 北京：中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1989.［12］蔡健,周靖,方小丹.中外鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)抗震設(shè)計(jì)安全度的比較［J］.建筑結(jié)構(gòu),2006,36(2):1-5.［13］王亞勇,郭子雄,呂西林.建筑抗震設(shè)計(jì)中地震作用的取值——主要國家抗震規(guī)范的比較［J］.建筑科學(xué),1999,15(5):36-39.［14］李慧.中、美、歐、日建筑抗震規(guī)范地震作用對(duì)比研究［D］.哈爾濱：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué),2011.［15］YANQIANG GAO, WENFENG LIU. Statistical analysis of fundamental periods of frameshear wall structures［J］. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 174-177: 2071-2078.［16］YANQIANG GAO, WENFENG LIU. Statistical analysis of fundamental periods of frame structures［J］. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012,226-228:1174-1180.
- 下載地址
-
你還沒注冊(cè)？或者沒有登錄？這篇論文要求至少是本站的注冊(cè)會(huì)員才能閱讀！
如果你還沒注冊(cè)，請(qǐng)趕緊點(diǎn)此注冊(cè)吧！
如果你已經(jīng)注冊(cè)但還沒登錄，請(qǐng)趕緊點(diǎn)此登錄吧！
